Section 206: Power to Call for Information, Inspect Books, and Conduct Inquiries

Podcast

0:00

The intention to explain the contours of Section 206 of the Companies Act, 2013, in a separate article stems from the significant substance and impact of this provision. While it is indirectly linked to Section 212 of the Act, addressing it first allows for a deeper understanding of nuances of Section 212. Section 206 deals with the - “Power to call for information, inspect books, and conduct inquiries”, serving as a mechanism for the Registrar of Companiesto assess a concerned company’s corporate health. This section is divided into seven sub-sections, each of the sub-section can also functioning as a standalone provision. To facilitate understanding, this article will analyze Section 206 in segments, focusing on its language and implications, while highlighting the critical role it plays in ensuring corporate accountability.

3.1. First Part: ‘Opinion of the Registrar’ under Sub-section (1)

Sub-section (1) of Section 206 begins:

 “Where on a scrutiny of any document filed by a company or on any information received by him, the Registrar is of the opinion that any further information or explanation or any further documents relating to the company is necessary, he may by a written notice require the company..."

Key Features:

1. Registrar’s Power to Issue Notices:

   - The Registrar may issue a notice after scrutinizing documents filed by the company or based on received information.

   - The decision to issue a notice is solely based on the Registrar’s opinion, without requiring third-party reports or audits, allowing flexibility in identifying irregularities.

2. Scope of the Notice:

   - The notice may request either information or an explanation, or specific documents, clarifying that its purpose is to seek clarifications rather than penalize the company. This approach ensures that companies can present their side before any adverse conclusions are drawn.

3. Written Response Requirement:

   - The company must provide a written response, furnishing the requested information or documents. 

   - Sub-clauses (a) and (b) of Sub-section (1) specify that the notice can request either information or documents but not both simultaneously, as the clauses are separated by “or,” ensuring clarity in compliance.

4. Reasonable Time for Compliance:

   - The term “reasonable time” is central to Sub-section (1), ensuring companies respond promptly to avoid delays in the inquiry process. This flexible timeline balances regulatory needs and operational constraints.

Non-Penal Nature:

Sub-section (1) does not impose penalties for non-compliance, making it an “information-seeking exercise” rather than a punitive action. This design emphasizes cooperation over confrontation, setting the stage for constructive engagement.

3.2. Second Part: Requirement of ‘Recording of Reasons’ for a Second Notice

Sub-section (2): Obligation to Provide Information

- The company is obligated to provide the requested information or documents “to the best of their knowledge.” This provision recognizes that companies may face limitations in accessing older records or detailed explanations.

- The attached proviso broadens the scope by allowing the Registrar to seek information from former employees for periods during which they were associated with the company, ensuring that accountability is not restricted to current management.

- Notably, there is no time limitation for how far back the Registrar can request information, providing wide latitude to uncover potential irregularities from the company’s past.

Sub-section (3): Grounds for Issuing a Second Notice

The Registrar may issue a second notice if:

1. The company fails to respond within the reasonable time specified.

2. The information provided is deemed inadequate.

3. The Registrar observes unsatisfactory affairs upon scrutinizing the documents.

4. There is evidence of deliberate non-disclosure of facts, signaling potential malfeasance.

- Requirement for Recording Reasons:

   - The Registrar must record reasons in writing when issuing a second notice, as per the attached proviso. This ensures transparency and clarity for the company receiving the notice and guards against arbitrary actions by regulatory authorities.

3.3. Third Part: Starting Point of ‘Inquiry’

Sub-section (4): Grounds for Initiating Inquiry

An inquiry may be initiated if:

1. The company conducts business for fraudulent or unlawful purposes.

2. The company violates provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.

3. The company fails to address investor grievances, undermining public trust.

Key Steps:

1. Order by the Registrar:

   - The Registrar issues an order informing the company of the allegations and requesting further information or documents.

   - The company is given a reasonable opportunity to be heard before an inquiry is initiated, ensuring due process.

2. Nature of Inquiry:

   - The inquiry is quasi-criminal in nature, given its focus on fraudulent or unlawful activities. This highlights its potential severity and the need for careful adherence to procedural norms.

Provisos under Sub-section (4):

1. Empowerment of the Central Government:

   - The Central Government may direct the Registrar to initiate an inquiry if deemed necessary, reflecting its overarching supervisory role.

2. Prosecution for Fraud:

   - If the company is found engaging in fraudulent activities, every officer responsible is punishable under Section 447, which deals with the offence of fraud. This provision ensures accountability and deters misconduct at the highest levels of management.

3.4. Fourth Part: Expansion of Powers of the Central Government

Sub-sections (5), (6), and (7): Enhanced Role of the Central Government

1. Sub-section (5): Power to Direct Inspection

   - The Central Government may direct inspection of a company’s books and papers through an appointed inspector. This mechanism strengthens oversight and ensures independent evaluation.

   - The phrase “circumstances so warrant” is undefined, leaving the discretion entirely with the Central Government. While this offers flexibility, it also raises concerns about potential misuse.

2. Sub-section (6): Inspection via Special or General Orders

   - Inspections may be directed through “special” or “general” orders, though these terms are not explicitly defined. This ambiguity could lead to interpretational challenges, necessitating clarity either through judicial interpretation or legislative amendments.

3. Sub-section (7): Punitive Measures

   - Companies failing to furnish requested information or documents are punishable under this provision. 

   - Liability extends to all officers of the company responsible for such non-compliance, ensuring collective accountability and reinforcing the importance of timely and accurate disclosures.

Conclusion:

Section 206 of the Companies Act, 2013, empowers the Registrar and Central Government to scrutinize and inquire into the affairs of a company. Its provisions balance the need for corporate transparency with procedural safeguards, ensuring that inquiries are initiated based on reasonable grounds and that companies are given fair opportunities to respond. 

---

FAQ on Section 206 of the Companies Act, 2013

What is the primary purpose of Section 206 of the Companies Act, 2013?

Section 206 empowers the Registrar of Companies to assess a company's corporate health through the ability to request information, inspect books, and conduct inquiries. This is done to ensure corporate accountability and transparency. It acts as a mechanism to scrutinize documents filed by companies or information received, allowing the Registrar to identify irregularities and request further clarification from companies.

How does the Registrar initiate the information-seeking process under Section 206?

The Registrar can initiate the information-seeking process if, after scrutinizing documents filed by a company or based on information received, they form an opinion that further information, explanation, or documents are necessary. The Registrar issues a written notice requesting this from the company. The key is that the decision is solely based on the Registrar’s opinion, without the need for third-party reports.

What type of requests can the Registrar make in their initial notice to a company?

The Registrar's notice can request either specific information, an explanation, or particular documents relating to the company. The notice is not intended to be penal in nature, rather it is designed to seek clarification and allows the company to present their perspective before any adverse findings. It is important to note that the Registrar cannot request both information and documents simultaneously in the same notice, they must be separately requested.

What happens if a company fails to comply with the initial notice from the Registrar?

If a company fails to respond within a "reasonable time," or if the provided information is inadequate, the Registrar can issue a second notice, but importantly, they must record the reasons for issuing this second notice in writing. The Registrar may also issue a second notice if they observe unsatisfactory affairs upon scrutiny or suspect non-disclosure of facts.

Under what circumstances can the Registrar initiate a formal inquiry into a company’s affairs?

A formal inquiry can be initiated if the Registrar has reason to believe that the company is engaged in fraudulent or unlawful business practices, is violating the Companies Act, 2013, or is failing to address investor grievances. It should be noted that the Central Government can also order the Registrar to initiate an inquiry if deemed necessary. The process before initiating an inquiry requires informing the company of the allegations and providing them with the opportunity to be heard, ensuring due process

What is the nature of the inquiries conducted under Section 206, and what are the consequences of such an inquiry?

The inquiry under Section 206 is considered to be quasi-criminal in nature. If the inquiry concludes that the company has engaged in fraudulent activity, each officer responsible for that activity is punishable under Section 447 of the Companies Act, 2013. This emphasizes the serious potential consequences of an inquiry, underlining the necessity for companies to adhere to the Act.

What powers does the Central Government have under Section 206, and how do these differ from the Registrar’s powers?

The Central Government has the power to direct an inspection of a company's books and papers by an appointed inspector, going beyond the Registrar's authority. The Central Government can order an inspection when "circumstances so warrant" through "special" or "general" orders, although these terms are not explicitly defined which raises concerns about potential misuse. These powers give the Central Government a greater level of oversight, and the specific circumstances in which it can exercise these powers are not strictly laid out.

What are the penalties for failing to comply with requests made by either the Registrar or the Central Government under Section 206?

Companies and their officers who fail to furnish requested information or documents are subject to punitive measures. Liability for non-compliance extends to all officers of the company who were responsible for the lapse, ensuring collective accountability and further reinforcing the importance of providing timely and accurate disclosures to both the Registrar and the Central Government when requested.